When to Use Bubble and When to Use Framer: A Practical Comparison

Choosing between Bubble and Framer depends on your project's needs. Here's a quick breakdown:

• Bubble: Best for building complex web apps with robust backend features like user authentication, database management, and API integrations. Ideal for SaaS platforms, e-commerce, and data-heavy applications. Pricing starts at $29/month.
• Framer: Perfect for creating visually stunning, interactive websites like portfolios, landing pages, and prototypes. It focuses on design and animations. Pricing starts at $5/month.

Quick Comparison

Key Takeaway

Choose Bubble for functionality and scalability. Opt for Framer for polished, interactive visuals.

Bubble Overview: Features and Best Uses

What Bubble Offers

Bubble is a full-stack no-code platform designed for building web applications without needing to write code. With over 4.69 million apps developed on the platform and more than $15 billion in funding raised by its users, Bubble has proven to be a popular choice for creators and businesses alike.

The platform's visual drag-and-drop editor combines design, workflows, and data management into one seamless experience. As Kevin C., a contributing author, puts it:

"Essentially, it's a WYSIWYG code editor. I like the ability to easily place screen widgets where I want, develop fully responsive apps, and that front-end and integrations are so seamless."

Bubble also comes with a built-in database that allows users to create, store, and manage structured data directly within the platform. It includes privacy controls and supports creating relationships between data types, making it ideal for apps that involve user accounts, transactions, or other complex data needs.

The platform boasts 6,500+ plugins for integrating services like Stripe, Twilio, and Google. It even supports creating public APIs for external access. On top of that, Bubble enables AI integration, letting users incorporate models like GPT-4, ChatGPT, and DALL-E into their apps.

These features make Bubble a strong choice for projects requiring extensive backend functionality.

When to Use Bubble

Bubble is particularly well-suited for complex web applications that demand robust backend capabilities. It's a great option for building SaaS platforms, marketplaces, CRMs, or educational tools.

For projects that are data-intensive, Bubble's integrated database and workflow automation are standout features. For instance, Beelango, an e-learning platform with over 100,000 users, highlights the platform's ability to handle large-scale data needs. Similarly, its rapid prototyping capabilities make it a top pick for MVP development. In November 2022, Sommo's DYVO app hit 100,000 users in just a few weeks, showcasing Bubble's scalability.

Bubble also excels in projects that require frequent updates and iterations. Its flexibility allows users to tweak workflows, adjust database structures, and refresh interfaces without diving into complex code. The extensive plugin ecosystem simplifies integrations with tools like payment processors, email services, and analytics platforms.

As Josh T., a small business user, notes:

"Bubble stands above other no-code solutions because of its full stack approach. It has a built-in database with privacy controls, the ability to create your own public APIs, and infinite extensibility through official and community plugins that integrate with 3rd party APIs like Stripe, Twilio, and Google."

Bubble's Drawbacks

While Bubble offers many strengths, it does come with some notable limitations. One of its main drawbacks is vendor lock-in. Since Bubble doesn't allow for code export, your app is tied to its ecosystem. If you ever decide to move to another platform, you'll need to rebuild the application from scratch.

Performance can also take a hit when handling large datasets, and while Bubble supports progressive web apps with excellent mobile usability, it doesn't support native mobile app development.

Finally, despite being a no-code platform, Bubble has a steeper learning curve compared to other no-code tools. Unlocking its full potential can take time, and its flexibility can sometimes feel overwhelming for beginners.

Understanding these limitations is key to deciding whether Bubble is the right fit for your project needs, especially if you're planning to build a complex application.

Framer Overview: Features and Best Uses

What Framer Offers

Framer stands out as a tool designed to create immersive, interactive designs, offering a different focus compared to Bubble's data-centric web app capabilities.

Framer combines prototyping and live web publishing in one platform - without requiring any coding skills. Its standout feature is the Motion animation library, which powers high-performance animations. This includes hardware-accelerated effects like parallax scrolling, looping animations, and smooth text transitions [20, 21].

The platform also includes an interactive component system, offering customizable elements like buttons, input fields, and checkboxes. These components are easy to integrate with triggers such as click, tap, or hover events. For users who want more advanced functionality, Framer supports custom React components and code overrides, giving you the flexibility to extend behaviors as needed. Plus, its fully interactive canvas allows you to instantly bring ideas to life - no need to export designs or rebuild layouts elsewhere.

"Framer is the modern alternative to Figma's prototyping tools, allowing designers to build and publish fully functional, high-performing websites without writing code." - Framer

When to Use Framer

Framer shines in projects where animations and interactivity play a central role in delivering an engaging user experience. It's particularly valuable for teams focused on creating precise, user-first designs with smooth animations and dynamic interactive elements. This makes it an excellent choice for portfolios, landing pages, and immersive digital experiences.

Framer complements tools like Bubble by focusing on the visual and interactive aspects of design, making it a great option when visual engagement is a priority.

"With Framer, your designs don't just look real - they are real, with full functionality, interactivity, and built-in web hosting." - Framer

Its ability to move quickly from design to deployment also makes it a strong contender for time-sensitive projects.

Framer's Drawbacks

While Framer excels at creating visually stunning and interactive websites, it does have its limitations. Its focus on frontend design makes it less ideal for data-heavy applications or projects requiring robust backend systems. Additionally, mastering its advanced animation features can take time, and its e-commerce capabilities are somewhat limited - building a full-scale online store might require external integrations.

For teams used to traditional development workflows, Framer's design-first approach may feel restrictive, especially when extensive custom coding or complex technical architectures are required. Next, we’ll dive into a side-by-side comparison of Bubble and Framer to highlight their key differences.

Best No-Code Website Builder?? Ultimate Comparison

Bubble vs Framer: Side-by-Side Comparison

Looking at these two platforms side by side helps highlight their strengths and which might be the better fit for your web project.

Ultimately, the right choice depends on your project's main objective. As Matt Graham, CEO of RapidDevelopers, explains:

"While Framer shines in the realm of interactive design and high-fidelity prototyping, Bubble.io offers a more comprehensive solution for building and launching complete web applications".

Feature Comparison Table

These differences in functionality set the stage for the next discussion: cost comparison.

User experiences with these platforms vary widely. Eve Weinberg, who experimented with both, shared her thoughts:

"I found that Framer was one of the easiest to use. I was up and running with it in no time, feeling completely confident in exploring all of its affordances, and I had a fully working website in about 1 day".

However, her experience with Bubble was notably different:

"On the exact opposite end of the spectrum was Bubble, which has the most robust feature set and functionality, but the UI and UX is so poor that I was so daunted, didn't feel confident exploring the tool on my own, couldn't get anything working the way I wanted, and still have yet to publish anything".

This comparison underscores a key trade-off: Bubble excels at handling complex applications with extensive backend features, while Framer focuses on delivering a polished, visually appealing user experience. Your choice should hinge on whether your priority is a powerful backend or striking frontend design.

Interestingly, some developers have found ways to bridge the gap between the two. In January 2024, Ketan Khamgaonkar demonstrated how to connect a Framer front-end to a Bubble backend. Using API requests and JavaScript, he enabled form submissions in Framer to redirect users to specific Bubble pages.

Next, let’s dive into how these platforms compare in terms of cost.

sbb-itb-fdf3c56

Cost Breakdown

This section outlines how the pricing structures of Bubble and Framer differ. Bubble uses a workload-based pricing model, while Framer relies on a site-based approach. Below, you'll find a detailed comparison of their pricing plans.

Bubble Pricing

Bubble operates on a workload unit system, which accounts for requests, file storage, and data retention. This means your costs depend on how much you use the platform, rather than just the features you access.

Here’s a breakdown of Bubble's pricing tiers:

• Free Plan ($0/month): Includes 50,000 workload units, one app editor, and six hours of server logs. Ideal for prototyping, but you can’t launch a live app.
• Starter Plan ($29/month billed annually): Unlocks app publishing with a custom domain, 175,000 workload units per month, recurring workflows, basic version control, and two days of server logs.
• Growth Plan ($119/month billed annually): Designed for scaling businesses, offering 250,000 workload units per month, two app editors, premium version control, two-factor authentication, and 14 days of server logs.
• Team Plan ($349/month billed annually): Geared toward collaborative development, with five app editors, 500,000 workload units per month, sub-apps, 25 custom branches, and automated security tests.
• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing available upon request. Includes dedicated servers, hosting location options, custom workload allocations, and uptime guarantees.

If you exceed your plan’s workload limits, additional costs are $0.30 per 1,000 units. Extra file storage is priced at $3 per 100 GB.

Framer Pricing

Framer uses a site-based pricing model, with separate tiers for individual websites and team collaboration. Discounts are available for annual billing.

Site Pricing (for individual websites):

• Free Plan: Allows up to three websites with Framer branding and a Framer.app subdomain. Great for personal projects or testing the platform.
• Mini Plan ($5/month per site billed annually): Removes Framer branding, supports custom domains, and allows 1,000 monthly visitors with one CMS collection.
• Basic Plan: Accommodates 10,000 monthly visitors, three CMS collections, and a 10-page search limit.
• Pro Plan ($28/month per site billed annually): Designed for larger projects, offering 200,000 monthly visitors, 10 CMS collections, a 300-page search limit, and built-in analytics.

Team Pricing (for collaborative work):

• Team Basic ($19/month per editor billed annually): Enables team collaboration with shared projects.
• Team Pro ($37/month per editor billed annually): Adds advanced team features and higher limits.

Framer also offers higher-tier plans for larger-scale projects:

• Launch Plan ($75/month billed annually): Includes 15,000 pages, 200 GB bandwidth, and 20 CMS collections.
• Scale Plan ($200/month billed annually): Expands to 30,000 pages, 500 GB bandwidth, and 30 CMS collections.

All paid Framer plans come with a 30-day money-back guarantee, offering a risk-free trial for your project.

Final Decision: Which Platform to Choose

Based on the feature and cost breakdown above, Bubble is the go-to choice for building complex web applications, while Framer shines for creating interactive and visually striking designs.

Choose Bubble if your app requires features like user authentication, database management, payment integration, or advanced workflows. On the other hand, Framer is perfect for projects focused on visually appealing marketing sites, landing pages, or high-fidelity prototypes with smooth animations.

If your project is likely to grow into a more complex application over time, Bubble saves you the hassle of migrating to a new platform later. But if your primary focus is on polished design and user experience, Framer's intuitive interface is a great fit, especially for teams already familiar with design tools. This way, you can balance immediate functionality with long-term scalability.

Ultimately, your platform choice should align with your project's technical needs and design goals. While budget is an important factor, making the wrong choice can lead to wasted time and frustration. Focus on what your project truly requires to make the best decision.

FAQs

How do I decide whether to use Bubble or Framer for my web project?

Choosing between Bubble and Framer comes down to what your project needs most.

If you're aiming to create visually engaging and interactive designs - think portfolios, landing pages, or blogs - Framer stands out. Its strength lies in delivering smooth animations and a polished, professional look.

On the flip side, if you're building more complex web applications, like SaaS platforms or multi-functional tools, Bubble is the better option. It provides powerful tools for managing workflows, databases, and scaling, making it perfect for tackling intricate development tasks.

To decide, think about your project goals, how much customization you need, and the kind of user experience you want to provide.

How do Bubble and Framer pricing models affect project costs?

Bubble and Framer take different approaches when it comes to pricing, and these differences can have a big impact on your project’s overall cost.

Bubble uses a pricing system based on workload units, which track how much server power your app consumes. This makes it a strong choice if you’re working on a project where backend performance and scalability are major priorities.

Framer, meanwhile, offers a free plan with limited features, and its paid plans range between $15 and $30 per month. The cost depends on the number of active users, which makes Framer a better fit for projects centered around interactive design, especially for smaller teams or those with simpler needs.

To decide between the two, think about your project’s scale, complexity, and budget. These factors will help you figure out which platform is the better match for your goals.

Can Bubble and Framer work together for projects needing both advanced backend functionality and stunning visual design?

Can Bubble and Framer Work Together?

Absolutely! Bubble and Framer can be a great duo for projects that need a strong backend and eye-catching design. Bubble is perfect for building complex web applications with powerful backend capabilities, while Framer excels at crafting interactive and visually stunning front-end designs.

By connecting Framer's front-end to a Bubble database, you can seamlessly integrate the two platforms. This setup lets you tap into the best of both worlds - solid technical functionality from Bubble and sleek, engaging visuals from Framer - creating a unified experience that checks both technical and design boxes.

Related posts

• Webflow vs Framer: Choosing the Right Platform in 2025
• Webflow vs Bubble: Which Website Builder is Right for You
• Framer vs Bubble: Which Website Builder is Right for You